The NRA is suing over Illinois’ semi-automatic handgun ban

SPRINGFIELD, IL – Illinois biweekly ban on semi-automatic weapons bans “ubiquitous” firearms in “radical” violation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, a federal lawsuit was filed National Rifle Association Tuesday claims.

The powerful NRA has joined a rally of gun rights activists seeking to overturn a recently-pending ban on dozens of rapid-fire pistols and long-shot pistols, as well as high-capacity magazines and attachments.

Democratic Governor J. B. Pritzker signed the law on January 10 in response to Art seven people died at the 4th of July parade in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park, where 30 people were also injured. He said he believes the law will withstand legal challenges to its constitutionality.

Two individual gun owners from Benton, nine miles (about 14 kilometers) northeast of St. Louis, are the lead plaintiffs in the NRA lawsuit, the second of which will be filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. They were joined by two southern Illinois gun dealers and shooting range operators, as well as a shooting sports trade association based in Connecticut.

The NRA’s request notes that the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2008 Heller decision refuses to uphold any restrictions on “commonly used weapons” today unless there is evidence of a “longstanding American tradition” of restrictions — another ruling from last summer.

The Illinois law “takes the radical step of banning virtually all modern semi-automatic rifles — the most popular type of rifle in the country, owned by tens of millions of Americans,” the document said.

According to the lawsuit, the 24 million AR-15 semi-automatic rifles in circulation in the U.S. far outnumber the 16 million Ford F-150 trucks, the nation’s best-selling vehicle.

Similar the constitutional challenge was filed last week in South Benton County. It was filed by gun owners and gun rights groups.

Other court cases, filed in the Southern District of Illinoischallenge the legislative procedure for approving the law.

Plaintiffs in all lawsuits are likely to go to southern Illinois courts because of the stronger attitude toward Second Amendment rights. Guns are much more favorable in central and southern Illinois, which has a larger population of hunters and sports shooters, than in northern metropolitan areas, especially Chicago. which continues to fight deadly gun violence.

The lawsuit, backed by the NRA, also argues that the law’s ban on high-capacity cartridges — no more than 10 rounds for rifles and 15 for handguns — and a long list of attachments and other accessories is just as problematic because the weapons in question can they cannot be operated, so the supplements are constitutionally protected “firearms.”

Pritzker and allies in the country refer to the weapons as “assault weapons.” The petition celebrates the tradition of carrying weapons and includes a glossary of terms. It explains that the banned semi-automatic weapon is not a machine gun — each round requires a separate trigger pull to eject.

It notes that detachable magazines date back to the Civil War, and the semi-automatic system is a century old.


Follow political writer John O’Connor at

Copyright 2023 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, copied or distributed without permission.

Source link

USA News