Graham becomes an early player to watch the Supreme Court drama

WASHINGTON – A list of Republicans ready to support Future Supreme Court candidate from President Joe Biden “Longer than you could imagine,” the second-ranked Senate Democrat recently teased reporters.

Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin declined to name names. But it is clear that Senator Lindsay Graham, RS.C., is at the top of the list.

Graham, who was tied to former President Donald Trump, is among a group of Republicans who declare their readiness to break the party line and vote for the as yet unannounced election of the White House to replace retired judge Stephen Breyer.

Whether Graham or any Republican will support Biden’s final candidate will be a new test for the president’s long-held and rarely achieved ambitions to see that Washington has taken a more bipartisan approach after the bitterness of the Trump era.


Democrats say getting a bipartisan vote is a top priority during the upcoming battle for confirmation. “It will be great for the Senate. It will be great for the Supreme Court, “Durbin said after a meeting at the White House on Thursday.” I hope we can achieve that goal. “

These efforts will make Graham a senator.

Whether Democrats will be able to win Graham’s vote – and the votes of other Republicans such as Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – remains to be seen. Steady bitterness over how Republicans won a majority in Trump’s Supreme Court still remains the dividing line.

Sometimes Graham signals a willingness to cooperate with the Democrats first, but retreats to a guerrilla corner.

Graham spearheaded efforts in the Senate to defend Brett Cavanaugh, Trump’s candidate for the Supreme Court, on charges of sexual assault, and it was Graham who brazenly refused a promise to refrain from reaffirming justice in the year of the presidential election. As chairman of the Senate Judicial Committee, he helped sit Amy Connie Barrett on the court a few days before Biden’s victory in the November 2020 election.


But Graham also has a history of working with Democrats and has long said lawmakers should show respect for the presidential election. He was the only Republican on the committee to vote for two candidates for President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court. Graham also voted against only a handful of Biden’s nominees in court, supporting about 30.

“I’m not playing this game like everyone else,” Graham told , explaining his voices.

So far, some in the republic have been mocked Biden’s promise to nominate a black woman, Historically the first, Graham hurried to defend him. “Put me in a conviction camp that the court and other institutions look like America,” he said.

But there is a catch. Graham wants the choice to be a South Carolina party, U.S. District Judge Michelle Childs, and said his vote would be “much more problematic” if it weren’t for her. He called Childs someone: “I see myself supporting – if she does well here.”


The White House says Childs, who was nominated to federal appeals court at the time Breyer announced her retirement, is being considered even though some liberal advocacy groups and unions are questioning her reputation.

Although Durbin did not support a particular candidate, he said he appreciated Graham’s strategy. “Starting with one or two votes from Republicans is a good start for any candidate,” he said, adding that “Lindsay is and will always be independent.”

Part of Graham’s view of Childs is that – unlike all current Supreme Court judges except Barrett – she did not go to Ivy League school. Matt Moore, a Republican strategist who served as Graham’s adviser in his 2020 campaign, said Childs ’promotion also appealed to voters at home.


“There is a certain amount of state honor when someone from South Carolina is tried in the Supreme Court,” Moore said.

Although Graham supported many Democratic candidates, he also followed the party’s line at two critical points – the first, when he did not allow Attorney General Merrick Garland to even get a hearing when he was nominated to the Supreme Court during the last year of Barack Obama’s presidency. Then, four years later, he became chairman of the Judicial Committee and nominated Barrett a few days before the presidential election.

These positions helped secure a 6-3 conservative majority in the Supreme Court, an ideological balance of power that will be maintained even after Breyer’s replacement is confirmed.

But Cavanaugh Graham’s defense was perhaps the defining moment for the senator. Graham exploded on Democrats during a hearing where Christine Blaise Ford accused Cavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in high school. Cavanaugh denied the charges.


Anger in his voice, Graham rebuked Democrats for treating Cavanaugh at a viral moment noted by conservatives.

“Boy, you all want power,” Graham said, addressing Democrats on the committee. “God, I hope you never get that. … I hate to say it because they were my friends. ”

Now there are signs that senators want relief. Bearing in mind that the vote will take place after Biden makes his choice, Democrats are reluctant to focus on the times when Graham angered them.

“I think he looks at the merits of these individuals and their qualifications, which is commendable,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Who works with Graham on the committee.

Democratic leaders also praised Graham last week for his work on Fr. a bill that ends compulsory arbitration in the case of sexual harassment and sexual harassment in the workplace. Durbin called him a “life partner.” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., was even more impressive.


“If he’s behind something, it’s done,” Sumer said. “So I want him to keep the most with us in the future.”

However, some will not be surprised if Graham opposes Biden’s choice.

Hawaii Sen. Macy Chiron, a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee who has worked with Graham in the past, said: “Basically, no matter what Lindsay does, back and forth and all that, I am no longer shocked that it is very bad. Because I think Lindsay is a much better person than such flip-flops show. “

Graham was first elected to the Senate in 2002, about ten years after the Senate voted 96-3 for Liberal Ruth Bader Ginzburg in the Supreme Court, and about 16 years after the Senate voted 98-0 for Conservative Antonina Scalia . Graham said the overwhelming confirmation of ideological contradictions shows that it has been lost.

“One is very conservative, the other is very liberal, but they were clearly qualified,” Graham said. “It simply came to our notice then. Now everything is connected with tribal politics, and people are worried about the primaries. “

Copyright 2022 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed without permission.

Source link

USA News